Lauren Juliff and Henrik Wold Nilsen

"Magnificent" performance

A review of climate index strategies

By  Lauren Juliff and Henrik Wold Nilsen, Storebrand Asset Management
ARTICLE · PUBLISHED 04.12.2023

In this commentary we look at the top overweight positions of climate index tracking funds relative to the market cap weighted index and find that almost all of them have relatively large overweights in the "Magnificent Seven", representing meaningful stock specific risk.

As the strapline for the 1960 Yul Brynner Western (almost) goes: “They were seven ... THEY (FOUGHT) PERFORMED LIKE SEVEN HUNDRED”. Global stock markets have been dominated this year by just seven US tech companies. "The Magnificent Seven", Apple, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, Nvidia and Tesla, have been responsible for “all of the gains in global stocks” throughout 2023 so far, due to investor projections about the prospects for Artificial Intelligence.

This is a much-reported topic, but this "Magnificent Seven" phenomenon has an important but so far under-reported consequence that we think is worth investor attention. We find a positive relationship between the performance of climate index funds and their positions in the Magnificent 7 stocks throughout 2023 and question whether this is aligned with the objectives of investors seeking "passive" global equity replacement strategies or exposure to the climate transition opportunity.
 

Read the full commentary here:

 

 

 

Latest insights

Opinion: Closing the global biodiversity funding gap is addressing systemic challenges

22.05.2024 Emine Isciel, Head of Climate and Environment
Aligning financial flows to reach the global biodiversity goals in the “decade of delivery”

In Focus Q1 2024: Transparency

15.05.2024 Storebrand Asset Management
A critical enabler for achieving sustainable investment

Yes, CSDDD isn’t perfect - but it’s still a great start

26.04.2024 Kamil Zabielski, Head of Sustainable Investment, Storebrand Asset Management
The soon-to-be approved EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive could mark a turning point in business accountability

Historical returns are no guarantee of future returns. Future returns will depend, among other things, on market developments, the manager's skills, the fund's risk profile and management fees. The returns can be negative as a result of price losses. There is risk associated with investments in the fund due to market movements, developments in currency, interest rates, economic conditions, industry- and company-specific conditions. Before investing, customers are advised to familiarize themselves with the fund's key information and prospectus, which contains further information about the fund's characteristics and costs.